Final Paper
ET 690 Educational Technology Seminar
Write a paper to answer the following questions. The paper
should be typed and double-spaced and conform to basic rules of
APA
style. Be sure that the paper is double-spaced, with 1 inch
margins, in a 12 point font, and with numbered pages. Under no
circumstances should the entire paper be fewer than 10 pages or
greater than 15 pages (page counts do not include your title page
or a page dedicated to references).
Your final paper will be based on at least two (and up to
eleven)
of the following articles:
- Technology in Education (pick three to read)
- Bryson, Mary, and de Castrell, Suzanne. (1998). "New
technologies and the cultural ecology of primary schooling: Imagining
teachers as Luddites in/deed." Educational Policy, 12(5), 542-567.
[Online]. Available: http://www.educ.ubc.ca/faculty/bryson/gentech/Luddites.html
- "Class Wars" (1997). The Wall Street Journal
Interactive Edition. [Online]. Available: http://www.iol.ie/~aidancbs/tech/course/papert.htm
- Talbott, Steve. (1996). "Do Computers Benefit
Education." [Online]. Available: http://netfuture.org/meditations/educ.html
- Stager, Gary. (2005). "Gary Stager on the State of
Educational Technology: Why the Tech Movement Is on Life Support."
District Administration. [Online]. Available: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Gary+Stager+on+the+State+of+Ed+Tech:+why+the+tech+movement+is+on+life...-a0128205136
- Daniel, Sir John, Cottrell, Robert, & Kozma,
Robert (2007). "The Economist Debate Series: The continuing
introduction of new technologies and new media adds little to the
quality of most education." The Economist.
Retrieved: February 16, 2009, from http://www.economist.com/debate/overview/121
(read all nine speaker statements, not necessarily the comments)
- Technology in Society: The Future (pick two to read)
- Technology in Society: The Present (pick six to read)
- Roszak, Theodore. (1999). "Shakespeare never lost a
document to a computer crash." [Online]. Available: http://trace.ntu.ac.uk/opinion/theo1.htm
- Talbott, Steve. (1996). "Reengineering society for
efficiency: It is possible; but do we want it?" [Online]. Available: http://netfuture.org/meditations/efficiency.2.html
- Talbott, Steve (2002). "From Baby Walkers to High Tech:
The anti-developmental stance." [Online]. Available: http://netfuture.org/2002/Aug2902_135.html#2a
- Talbott, Steve. (1996). "Will Advertising Keep the Net
Free." [Online]. Available: http://netfuture.org/meditations/advertising.html
- Winner, Langdon. (1997). "Cyberlibertarian Myths and
the Prospects for Community." [Online]. Available: http://www.rpi.edu/~winner/cyberlib2.html
- Winner, Langdon (2000). "Enthusiasm and Concern:
Results of a New Technology Poll." NETFUTURE, 103. [Online]. Available:
http://netfuture.org/2000/Feb2900_103.html
- Talbott, Steve. (2003). "Does the Future Compute?"
NETFUTURE, 142. [Online]. Available: http://www.netfuture.org/2003/Feb2503_142.html#2
- Talbott, Steve. (2003). "The Internet: Reflections on
Our Present Discontents." NETFUTURE, 150. [Online]. Available: http://www.netfuture.org/2003/Oct0703_150.html#1d
- Talbott, Steve. (2004). "Where Does the User End and
PowerPoint Begin?" NETFUTURE, 153. [Online]. Available: http://www.netfuture.org/2004/Jan0604_153.html#1b
Choose at least two of the above articles. Additionally,
locate
at least two other academic sources (generally published, peer-reviewed
papers) relating to the above articles. Write a thoughtful essay
relating your chosen articles to the topics we discussed in class.
Your paper does not have to cover every point we made in class
(this is a paper not a book), but you should find several major
themes that tie the above articles to the class readings. Consider
important themes including but not limited to: Postman's gods,
the Faustian bargain of technology, the purpose of school and
how that relates to society, the impact of society/politics on
technology and technology on society, the impact of technology
on children's development, alternatives to technology in schools
and society, technology as a political artifact, problems with
society's focus on information.
This is a fairly open-ended paper. You will be graded on how
well you demonstrate an understanding of the chosen articles and
how well you relate them to the class readings and discussions.
Your paper should be more than just a recap of the authors' points
of view. It should show a critical analysis of their points and
a synthesis of their points with the class readings. Note that
not all of the papers directly relate to our class discussions,
but they can all be related and discussed in the context of the
class.
The choice of articles should be based on the creation of a
common theme or themes for your paper. The articles are grouped
on some basic themes, but you may choose seemingly unrelated articles
by tying them together with a common theme. You should not choose
unrelated articles to fill space by bouncing from article to article.
That is, ten separate one to two page papers (or for that matter,
four separate two to three page papers) on each of the above articles
is not appropriate. A better approach is to choose a few articles
and one or more important and related themes. Relate each of your
chosen articles to your theme(s).
Return to ET690
Home Page.
This page was prepared by Dr.
David M. Marcovitz.
Last Updated: March 13, 2009